INTERFACE OF THE ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY LAWS, ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: THE INJURY AND CAUSALITY TESTS IN CANADA

Interface of the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Laws, Administrative Tribunal and Economic Analysis: the Injury and Causality Tests in Canada

Interface of the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Laws, Administrative Tribunal and Economic Analysis: the Injury and Causality Tests in Canada

Blog Article

In the consequence analyzing methods which are frequently used by the Canadian administrative tribunal, there CREAM are dualistic approximation method which uses the trend analysis and unitary approximation method which uses economic analysis.The disadvantage of the dualistic approximation method is that it cannot separate the effect out of dumping and the effect of dumping.In the contrary, the unitary approximation method includes methods like the countable partial equipoise model and computation model which could overcome the similar question.

This thesis made comments on the advantages and disadvantages of the above two economic analysis by way of analyzing the Canadian case used in the damage arbitration process.And found that both the two methods could enhance the objectivity, transparency and fairness in the damage arbitration, meanwhile, the countable partial equipoise model is more practical under the restriction Nutritionals - Standard Tube Feeding of time and resources.Especially, this thesis definitely brought forward the conjunction between the trade regulation and the economic analysis in the process of the damage arbitration of the Canadian administrative tribunal.

Report this page